The High Cost Of Reception Is Not The Cause Of Too Many People.

< p > recently, the ministries and commissions of the central government announced the "three public budget in 2014" on the official website.

The difference between the reception fees of ministries and commissions is quite different, causing netizens' concern.

For example, the Ministry of agriculture's budget for public service in 2014 is more than 20 million yuan, while the Ministry of housing is only 139 thousand and 500 yuan.

< /p >

< p > the Ministry of agriculture responded that the Ministry of agriculture is one of the largest and the largest number of departments in the central a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > the state organ < /a >, and the average annual per capita official hospitality budget in 2014 is only 263 yuan.

< /p >

The concept of "per capita hospitality" has been thrown out by the Ministry of agriculture (P). It seems to be very innovative, but it actually confuses the essence.

The premise of "per capita" is that everyone has a share.

< /p >

< p > reception fee is not so. Some < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > reception fee < /a > is "leadership only has share".

Most of the public money reception is not related to ordinary employees.

What is the significance of the average per capita hospitality fee? Not only "public funds," but also "three public expenditures".

< /p >

< p > take < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > public funds to go abroad < /a >, some leaders go abroad several times a year, but most employees can't get out of their country once in a lifetime.

You can say that this is a job need, but this obviously has nothing to do with the staff, but dragging the staff out to be "denominator", is it reasonable? < /p >

< p > fear of high fee for reception and no reason for fear.

Objectively speaking, the reception budget of the Ministry of agriculture in recent years has been decreasing year by year.

< /p >

< p > statistics show that the Ministry of agriculture's budget for public service reception in 2014 was 24 million 607 thousand and 100 yuan, 35 million 303 thousand and 400 yuan in 2013 and 37 million 556 thousand and 800 yuan in 2012, which can be seen as the result of anti "four winds", but against the "four winds" is a test that has no end.

In the reception budget, we should not only see how much it has been reduced, but also see if there is any room for further reduction.

< /p >

< p > supervision in public funds has always been a difficult problem.

Public money reception can not be attended by everyone, but supervision can be attended by everyone.

It is clear that all the details of the public money reception must be made public, at least in the first place.

Whether money is spent is reasonable, let employees first judge.

< /p >