"To Push Justice In Public" Requires Specific Implementation

More than P, CPPCC members of the legal profession published their views on the "two high" work report during the discussion of the non partisan panel. Peng Xuefeng pointed out that the open process should protect the privacy rights of the parties, state secrets and the legitimate rights and interests of minors and how to make them public. < /p >
"P", member of the CPPCC National Committee, Beijing Jincheng Tongda lawyer "a href=" //www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp "> /a > Lawyer Liu Hongyu pointed out that judicial openness is to put power under the sun, hoping to make sunlight the disinfectant of power. But the law is a professional skill. It is not enough technically to put the trial Books Online, invite special supervisors and people's jurors. < /p >
< p > Liu Hongyu said that last year there was an example of media and public opinion kidnapping justice, which had some influence on minors, but no one came out to apologize. The law needs more rational and professional supervision. This responsibility is entrusted to the procuratorate in the institutional framework, and the procuratorate should play a good supervisory role. < /p >
< p > "judicial reform" a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > Administration "/a > localization" is also the focus of CPPCC members. Huang Lianxi, a member of the National Committee of CPPCC and partner of Zhejiang Tian Shi law firm, said that the court could not be treated as an administrative department, and that leaders should not be allowed to pull ties or take notes. < /p >
< p > Peng Xuefeng pointed out that the ultimate goal of carrying out the reform of judicial management system and achieving unified management at the provincial level is to achieve central management and separate the jurisdiction from the executive power. This is a very pragmatic decision. But in this process, we should also pay attention to avoiding provincial centralization or administrative centralization within the judiciary. < /p >
< p > Liu Hongyu said that China's implementation of the "a href=" //www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp "two trial final appeal system < /a >, the lower court in order to meet the standard, in order not to be changed, it is very likely to take the initiative to ask the higher authorities, then the second trial will be meaningless. The two tier trial is not going to become a first class trial? This is very dangerous. We should abolish unreasonable assessment indicators and improve the level of judicial trial. < /p >
< p > Peng Xuefeng and Huang Lianxi also suggested paying attention to the outflow of frontline judges. Peng Xuefeng pointed out that now there are fewer people in the case. Many first-line judges in Beijing, Shanghai and other places decide more than 100 cases a year, and the pressure is too great. < /p >
"Reform is far from enough," said Li Daokui, member of the CPPCC National Committee and director of the China and world economic research center of Tsinghua University. "Law enforcement in stock market and securities related fields has not been effective for a long time," said P. < /p >
< p > Li Daokui suggested that a securities court and a Procuratorate in Shanghai should be set up to be separated from the local government and directly responsible to the Supreme Court. All cases related to securities should be concentrated there. "China's maritime courts are doing very well, indicating that they can be achieved under the existing system." < /p >